Mazda CX-9 2016 vs Mazda CX-5 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 250 HP | 184 HP | |
| Torque: | 310 NM | 251 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Mazda CX-9 engine produces 66 HP more power than Mazda CX-5, whereas torque is 59 NM more than Mazda CX-5. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 74 litres | 58 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Mazda CX-5 2012: Engine power is automatically (without driver intervention) distributed among the wheels based on conditions using a hydraulic multi-disc clutch, viscous clutch, or similar traction control device. Some systems allow locking of multi-disc clutch manually for permanent all wheel drive. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 224 mm (8.8 inches) | 215 mm (8.5 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.08 m | 4.54 m | |
| Width: | 1.97 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Mazda CX-9 is larger. Mazda CX-9 is 54 cm longer than the Mazda CX-5, 13 cm wider, while the height of Mazda CX-9 is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 407 litres | 503 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 407 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 503 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2017 litres | 1620 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-9 (by 397 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-9 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Mazda CX-5. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`570 kg | 2`058 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`837 kg | 1`602 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 733 kg | 456 kg | |
| Mazda CX-9 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 38 procentiem more than Mazda CX-5. Therefore, Mazda CX-9 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 7200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-9 has
|
Mazda CX-5 has
| |