Mazda CX-9 2016 vs Audi Q7 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 231 HP | 340 HP | |
| Torque: | 420 NM | 500 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 5.9 seconds | |
| Mazda CX-9 engine produces 109 HP less power than Audi Q7, whereas torque is 80 NM less than Audi Q7. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 74 litres | 85 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.08 m | 5.06 m | |
| Width: | 1.97 m | 1.97 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.74 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda CX-9 is 1 cm longer than the Audi Q7, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 407 litres | 740 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 407 litres | 740 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2017 litres | 1925 litres | |
| In 7-seat version Audi Q7 has more luggage space (by 333 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-9 (by 92 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 12.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-9 is 0.7 metres less than that of the Audi Q7, which means Mazda CX-9 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`570 | 2`950 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 56 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-9 has
|
Audi Q7 has
| |