Mazda CX-9 2012 vs Dodge Durango 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.7 Petrol | 3.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 277 HP | 294 HP | |
| Torque: | 367 NM | 353 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Mazda CX-9 engine produces 17 HP less power than Dodge Durango, but torque is 14 NM more than Dodge Durango. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.3 | 11.2 | |
| Mazda CX-9 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Dodge Durango, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda CX-9 could require 15 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 76 litres | 93 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 840 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| Dodge Durango gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 203 mm (8 inches) | 207 mm (8.1 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 460'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Dodge Durango engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Jeep Grand Cherokee, Chrysler Grand Voyager, Chrysler Town & Country | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Dodge Durango might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Dodge Durango engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Dodge Durango 2013 3.6 engine: The variable valve timing regulators, oil pump, water pump, and thermostat are known for their limited lifespan. Another common issue is the clogging of oil channels with wear particles.
After ... More about Dodge Durango 2013 3.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.10 m | 5.11 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.80 m | |
| Mazda CX-9 is 1 cm shorter than the Dodge Durango, 1 cm wider, while the height of Mazda CX-9 is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 487 litres | 490 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 487 litres | 490 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2852 litres | 2410 litres | |
| In 7-seat version Dodge Durango has more luggage space (by 3 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-9 (by 442 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12.5 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`712 | 2`948 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 27 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Dodge Durango has
| |