Mazda CX-9 2009 vs Subaru B9 Tribeca 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.7 Petrol | 3.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 273 HP | 260 HP | |
| Torque: | 367 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
| Mazda CX-9 engine produces 13 HP more power than Subaru B9 Tribeca, whereas torque is 17 NM more than Subaru B9 Tribeca. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.9 | 11.6 | |
|
The Subaru B9 Tribeca is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda CX-9 consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Subaru B9 Tribeca, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda CX-9 could require 195 litres more fuel. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.09 m | 4.86 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Mazda CX-9 is larger. Mazda CX-9 is 23 cm longer than the Subaru B9 Tribeca, 6 cm wider, while the height of Mazda CX-9 is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 487 litres | 235 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 487 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 235 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2852 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`062 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 10 200 | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Subaru B9 Tribeca has
| |