Mazda CX-9 2009 vs Land Rover Range Rover 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.7 Petrol | 4.4 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Mazda CX-9) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Land Rover Range Rover) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 273 HP | 313 HP | |
| Torque: | 367 NM | 700 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 7.8 seconds | |
| Mazda CX-9 engine produces 40 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover, whereas torque is 333 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.9 | 9.4 | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda CX-9 consumes 3.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda CX-9 could require 525 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 76 litres | 100 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 580 km in combined cycle | 1060 km in combined cycle | |
| 670 km on highway | 1210 km on highway | ||
| Land Rover Range Rover gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Range Rover engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Used also on Land Rover Range Rover Sport | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Range Rover might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Land Rover Range Rover engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.09 m | 4.97 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | no data | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | no data | |
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 487 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 487 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2852 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`062 | 3`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 10 200 | 14 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-9 has
|
Land Rover Range Rover has
| |