Mazda CX-9 2009 vs Ford Explorer 2011

 
Mazda CX-9
2009 - 2012
Ford Explorer
2011 - 2015
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 3.7 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 273 HP240 HP
Torque: 367 NM270 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a seconds8.3 seconds
Mazda CX-9 engine produces 33 HP more power than Ford Explorer, whereas torque is 97 NM more than Ford Explorer.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 12.910.2
The Ford Explorer is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Mazda CX-9 consumes 2.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Explorer, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda CX-9 could require 405 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 76 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 580 km in combined cycle680 km in combined cycle
670 km on highway830 km on highway
Ford Explorer gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive)Front wheel drive (FWD)

Mazda CX-9 has 4x4: Engine power is automatically (without driver intervention) distributed among the wheels based on conditions using a hydraulic multi-disc clutch, viscous clutch, or similar traction control device. Some systems allow locking of multi-disc clutch manually for permanent all wheel drive.

Dimensions

Length: 5.09 m5.01 m
Width: 1.94 m2.00 m
Height: 1.73 m1.79 m
Mazda CX-9 is 8 cm longer than the Ford Explorer, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda CX-9 is 6 cm lower.
Seats: 7 seatsno data
Trunk capacity: 487 litres1223 litres
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: 487 litresno data
Trunk capacity with 5 seats: no data1223 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
2852 litresno data
Turning diameter: 11.4 metersno data
Gross weight (kg): 2`0622`700
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 10 20012 600
Pros and Cons: Mazda CX-9 has
  • more power
  • has 4x4 drive
  • lower price
Ford Explorer has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv