Mazda CX-9 2009 vs Ford Explorer 2008

 
Mazda CX-9
2009 - 2012
Ford Explorer
2008 - 2010
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 3.7 Petrol4.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 273 HP213 HP
Torque: 367 NM344 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a seconds10.2 seconds
Mazda CX-9 engine produces 60 HP more power than Ford Explorer, whereas torque is 23 NM more than Ford Explorer.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 12.913.5
Mazda CX-9 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Explorer, which means that by driving the Mazda CX-9 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 76 litres85 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 580 km in combined cycle620 km in combined cycle
670 km on highway750 km on highway
Ford Explorer gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive)Rear wheel drive (RWD)

Mazda CX-9 has 4x4: Engine power is automatically (without driver intervention) distributed among the wheels based on conditions using a hydraulic multi-disc clutch, viscous clutch, or similar traction control device. Some systems allow locking of multi-disc clutch manually for permanent all wheel drive.

Dimensions

Length: 5.09 m4.94 m
Width: 1.94 m1.87 m
Height: 1.73 m1.83 m
Mazda CX-9 is larger, but lower.
Mazda CX-9 is 15 cm longer than the Ford Explorer, 6 cm wider, while the height of Mazda CX-9 is 11 cm lower.
Seats: 7 seatsno data
Trunk capacity: 487 litresno data
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: 487 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
2852 litresno data
Turning diameter: 11.4 meters11.2 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda CX-9 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Ford Explorer.
Gross weight (kg): 2`0622`808
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 10 200no data
Pros and Cons: Mazda CX-9 has
  • more power
  • has 4x4 drive
Ford Explorer has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv