Mazda CX-9 2009 vs Audi Q7 2009

 
Mazda CX-9
2009 - 2012
Audi Q7
2009 - 2015
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 3.7 Petrol3.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 273 HP240 HP
Torque: 367 NM550 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a seconds8.5 seconds
Mazda CX-9 engine produces 33 HP more power than Audi Q7, but torque is 183 NM less than Audi Q7.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 12.99.1
The Audi Q7 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Mazda CX-9 consumes 3.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q7, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda CX-9 could require 570 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 76 litres100 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 580 km in combined cycle1090 km in combined cycle
670 km on highway1280 km on highway
Audi Q7 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Ground clearance: 203 mm (8 inches)205 mm (8.1 inches)

Dimensions

Length: 5.09 m5.09 m
Width: 1.94 m1.98 m
Height: 1.73 m1.74 m
Mazda CX-9 is smaller.
Mazda CX-9 and Audi Q7 are practically the same length.
Seats: 7 seats5 seats
Trunk capacity: 487 litres775 litres
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: 487 litresno data
Trunk capacity with 5 seats: no data775 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
2852 litres2035 litres
The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-9 (by 817 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.4 meters12 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda CX-9 is 0.6 metres less than that of the Audi Q7, which means Mazda CX-9 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`0623`200
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
average
Average price (€): 10 20017 400
Pros and Cons: Mazda CX-9 has
  • more power
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Audi Q7 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv