Mazda CX-9 2009 vs Audi Q7 2009
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 3.7 Petrol | 3.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 273 HP | 240 HP | |
Torque: | 367 NM | 550 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
Mazda CX-9 engine produces 33 HP more power than Audi Q7, but torque is 183 NM less than Audi Q7. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.9 | 9.1 | |
The Audi Q7 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda CX-9 consumes 3.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q7, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda CX-9 could require 570 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 76 litres | 100 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 580 km in combined cycle | 1090 km in combined cycle | |
670 km on highway | 1280 km on highway | ||
Audi Q7 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Ground clearance: | 203 mm (8 inches) | 205 mm (8.1 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.09 m | 5.09 m | |
Width: | 1.94 m | 1.98 m | |
Height: | 1.73 m | 1.74 m | |
Mazda CX-9 is smaller. Mazda CX-9 and Audi Q7 are practically the same length. | |||
Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
Trunk capacity: | 487 litres | 775 litres | |
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 487 litres | no data | |
Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 775 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2852 litres | 2035 litres | |
The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-9 (by 817 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 12 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mazda CX-9 is 0.6 metres less than that of the Audi Q7, which means Mazda CX-9 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`062 | 3`200 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | average | |
Average price (€): | 10 200 | 15 600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-9 has
|
Audi Q7 has
| |