Mazda CX-9 2007 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 4.7 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 263 HP | 288 HP | |
| Torque: | 339 NM | 445 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
| Mazda CX-9 engine produces 25 HP less power than Toyota Land Cruiser, whereas torque is 106 NM less than Toyota Land Cruiser. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.7 | 14.4 | |
|
The Mazda CX-9 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda CX-9 consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means that by driving the Mazda CX-9 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 255 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 76 litres | 93 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 640 km in combined cycle | |
| 710 km on highway | 790 km on highway | ||
| Toyota Land Cruiser gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.07 m | 4.95 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 1.97 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.95 m | |
| Mazda CX-9 is 12 cm longer than the Toyota Land Cruiser, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda CX-9 is 22 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 487 litres | 701 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 487 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 701 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2852 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`735 | 3`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6600 | 21 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-9 has
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has
| |