Mazda CX-9 2007 vs Lexus LX 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 5.7 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 263 HP | 367 HP | |
| Torque: | 339 NM | 530 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 7.5 seconds | |
| Mazda CX-9 engine produces 104 HP less power than Lexus LX, whereas torque is 191 NM less than Lexus LX. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.5 | 14.5 | |
|
The Mazda CX-9 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda CX-9 consumes 3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Lexus LX, which means that by driving the Mazda CX-9 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 450 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 76 litres | 93 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 640 km in combined cycle | |
| 770 km on highway | 810 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 840'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Lexus LX engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 1 years | 19 years | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Lexus LX might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Lexus LX engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.07 m | 4.99 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 1.97 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.92 m | |
| Mazda CX-9 is 8 cm longer than the Lexus LX, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda CX-9 is 19 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 8 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 487 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 487 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2852 litres | 2560 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-9 (by 292 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`635 | 3`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6600 | 27 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-9 has
|
Lexus LX has
| |