Mazda CX-9 2007 vs Dodge Durango 2004
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 5.7 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 263 HP | 349 HP | |
| Torque: | 339 NM | 509 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Mazda CX-9 engine produces 86 HP less power than Dodge Durango, whereas torque is 170 NM less than Dodge Durango. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.5 | 14.6 | |
|
The Mazda CX-9 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda CX-9 consumes 3.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Dodge Durango, which means that by driving the Mazda CX-9 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 465 litres of fuel. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.07 m | 5.10 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 1.93 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.89 m | |
| Mazda CX-9 is 3 cm shorter than the Dodge Durango, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda CX-9 is 16 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 487 litres | 532 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 487 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 532 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2852 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`635 | 2`995 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6800 | 6400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-9 has
|
Dodge Durango has
| |