Mazda CX-9 2016 vs Nissan Pathfinder 2016
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.5 | 3.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 231 HP | 284 HP | |
| Torque: | 420 NM | 352 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 - 8.8 | 10.2 - 10.7 | |
|
Mazda CX-9 petrol engines consumes on average 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than Nissan Pathfinder. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.08 m | 5.04 m | |
| Width: | 1.97 m | 1.96 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.78 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda CX-9 is 3 cm longer than the Nissan Pathfinder, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda CX-9 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 407 litres | 453 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2017 litres | 2251 litres | |
|
Nissan Pathfinder has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mazda CX-9 has 46 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Pathfinder. This could mean that the Mazda CX-9 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Pathfinder (by 234 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-9 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Nissan Pathfinder. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`605 | ~ 2`717 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-9 has
|
Nissan Pathfinder has
| |