Mazda CX-9 2016 vs Mazda CX-5 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mazda CX-9 is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Mazda CX-5 has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 2.5 (petrol) | 2.0 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Mazda CX-5 is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 250 HP | 150 - 192 HP | |
| Torque: | 310 NM | 210 - 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 7.9 - 10.2 seconds | |
| In general, Mazda CX-5 are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Mazda CX-9. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 - 8.8 | 4.6 - 7.3 | |
|
Mazda CX-9 petrol engines consumes on average 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda CX-5. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 224 mm (8.8 inches) | 210 - 215 mm (8.3 - 8.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda CX-9 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.08 m | 4.54 m | |
| Width: | 1.97 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.69 m | |
|
Mazda CX-9 is larger. Mazda CX-9 is 54 cm longer than the Mazda CX-5, 13 cm wider, while the height of Mazda CX-9 is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 407 litres | 505 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2017 litres | 1620 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Mazda CX-9 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-9 (by 397 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-9 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Mazda CX-5. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`605 kg | ~ 2`039 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`903 kg | ~ 1`500 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 702 kg | ~ 539 kg | |
| Mazda CX-9 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 23 procentiem more than Mazda CX-5. Therefore, Mazda CX-9 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 7400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-9 has
|
Mazda CX-5 has
| |