Mazda CX-9 2016 vs Land Rover Defender 2019
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Mazda CX-9 is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Land Rover Defender can be equipped only with four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Mazda CX-9 also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.5 (petrol) | 2.0 - 5.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 231 HP | 200 - 525 HP | |
| Torque: | 420 NM | 400 - 625 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 5.4 - 10.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 - 8.8 | 7.7 - 12.8 | |
|
Mazda CX-9 petrol engines consumes on average 2.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than Land Rover Defender. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.08 m | 5.02 m | |
| Width: | 1.97 m | 2.01 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.97 m | |
| Mazda CX-9 is 6 cm longer than the Land Rover Defender, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda CX-9 is 22 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 407 litres | 972 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2017 litres | 2277 litres | |
|
Land Rover Defender has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mazda CX-9 has 565 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Defender. This could mean that the Mazda CX-9 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Land Rover Defender (by 260 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 13.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-9 is 1.3 metres less than that of the Land Rover Defender, which means Mazda CX-9 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`605 | ~ 3`199 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 72 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-9 has
|
Land Rover Defender has
| |