Mazda CX-9 2016 vs Ford Explorer 2018

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Mazda CX-9
2016 -
Ford Explorer
2018 -
Gearbox: Automatic Automatic
Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Mazda CX-9 is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Ford Explorer can be equipped only with four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Mazda CX-9 also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs.
Engines: 2.53.5

Performance

Power: 231 HP249 HP
Torque: 420 NM346 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a seconds8.7 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.4 - 8.812.4
Mazda CX-9 petrol engines consumes on average 3.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than Ford Explorer.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 5.08 m5.02 m
Width: 1.97 m1.99 m
Height: 1.75 m1.79 m
Mazda CX-9 is 6 cm longer than the Ford Explorer, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda CX-9 is 4 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 407 litres595 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
2017 litresno data
Ford Explorer has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, Mazda CX-9 has 188 litres less trunk space than the Ford Explorer. This could mean that the Mazda CX-9 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable.
Turning diameter: 11.8 metersno data
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`605no data
Safety: no data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): no data37 800
Pros and Cons: Mazda CX-9 has
  • also available in 2WD
  • lower fuel consumption
Ford Explorer has
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv