Mazda CX-9 2016 vs Ford Explorer 2018
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.5 | 2.3 - 3.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 250 HP | 280 - 365 HP | |
| Torque: | 310 NM | 346 - 475 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 8.7 seconds | |
| In general, Ford Explorer are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Mazda CX-9. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 - 8.8 | 10.6 - 13.0 | |
|
Mazda CX-9 petrol engines consumes on average 3.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Ford Explorer. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 224 mm (8.8 inches) | 198 mm (7.8 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda CX-9 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.08 m | 5.02 m | |
| Width: | 1.97 m | 1.99 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.79 m | |
| Mazda CX-9 is 6 cm longer than the Ford Explorer, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda CX-9 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 407 litres | 595 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2017 litres | 2313 litres | |
|
Ford Explorer has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Mazda CX-9 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Explorer (by 296 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`605 kg | ~ 3`178 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`903 kg | ~ 2`083 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 702 kg | ~ 1`095 kg | |
| Mazda CX-9 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 56 procentiem less than Ford Explorer. Therefore, Ford Explorer is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 21 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-9 has
|
Ford Explorer has
| |