Mazda CX-9 2016 vs BMW X5 2013
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Mazda CX-9 is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while BMW X5 can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Mazda CX-9 also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.5 (petrol) | 2.0 - 4.4 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 231 HP | 218 - 450 HP | |
| Torque: | 420 NM | 350 - 740 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 5 - 8.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 - 8.8 | 5.6 - 10.4 | |
|
Mazda CX-9 petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than BMW X5. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.08 m | 4.88 m | |
| Width: | 1.97 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.76 m | |
|
Mazda CX-9 is larger, but slightly lower. Mazda CX-9 is 19 cm longer than the BMW X5, 3 cm wider, while the height of Mazda CX-9 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 407 litres | 650 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2017 litres | 1870 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Mazda CX-9 has 243 litres less trunk space than the BMW X5. This could mean that the Mazda CX-9 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-9 (by 147 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 12.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-9 is 0.9 metres less than that of the BMW X5, which means Mazda CX-9 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`605 | ~ 2`803 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 27 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-9 has
|
BMW X5 has
| |