Mazda CX-9 2012 vs Volvo XC60 2013
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mazda CX-9 is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Volvo XC60 has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 3.7 (petrol) | 2.0 - 3.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Volvo XC60 is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 273 - 277 HP | 136 - 306 HP | |
| Torque: | 367 NM | 320 - 440 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 seconds | 6.9 - 11.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.3 | 5.3 - 10.7 | |
|
Mazda CX-9 petrol engines consumes on average 2.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volvo XC60. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 203 mm (8 inches) | 230 mm (9.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo XC60 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.10 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Mazda CX-9 is larger. Mazda CX-9 is 45 cm longer than the Volvo XC60, 5 cm wider, while the height of Mazda CX-9 is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 487 litres | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2852 litres | 1455 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Mazda CX-9 has 8 litres less trunk space than the Volvo XC60. This could mean that the Mazda CX-9 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-9 (by 1397 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`712 | ~ 2`401 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 15 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-9 has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |