Mazda CX-9 2012 vs Honda CR-V 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mazda CX-9 is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Honda CR-V has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 3.7 (petrol) | 1.6 - 2.4 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 273 - 277 HP | 120 - 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 367 NM | 190 - 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 seconds | 9.7 - 12.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.3 | 4.5 - 8.4 | |
|
Mazda CX-9 petrol engines consumes on average 3.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Honda CR-V. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.10 m | 4.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Mazda CX-9 is larger. Mazda CX-9 is 54 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, 12 cm wider, while the height of Mazda CX-9 is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 487 litres | 589 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2852 litres | 1669 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Mazda CX-9 has 102 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. This could mean that the Mazda CX-9 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-9 (by 1183 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`712 | ~ 2`133 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 12 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-9 has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |