Mazda CX-9 2012 vs Honda CR-V 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mazda CX-9 is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Honda CR-V has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 3.7 (petrol) | 1.6 - 2.4 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Honda CR-V is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 273 HP | 120 - 185 HP | |
| Torque: | 367 NM | 192 - 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 seconds | 9.7 - 12.8 seconds | |
| In general, Mazda CX-9 are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Honda CR-V. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.3 | 4.5 - 8.4 | |
|
Mazda CX-9 petrol engines consumes on average 3.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Honda CR-V. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 203 mm (8 inches) | 160 - 170 mm (6.3 - 6.7 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda CX-9 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.10 m | 4.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Mazda CX-9 is larger. Mazda CX-9 is 54 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, 12 cm wider, while the height of Mazda CX-9 is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 487 litres | 1053 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2852 litres | 2008 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Mazda CX-9 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-9 (by 844 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.8 meters | |
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`712 kg | ~ 2`133 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 2`012 kg | ~ 1`573 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 700 kg | ~ 560 kg | |
| Mazda CX-9 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 20 procentiem more than Honda CR-V. Therefore, Mazda CX-9 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 10 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-9 has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |