Mazda CX-9 2012 vs Toyota Highlander 2013
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 3.7 | 2.7 - 3.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 273 - 277 HP | 188 - 280 HP | |
| Torque: | 367 NM | 252 - 337 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 seconds | 7.3 - 10.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.3 | 8.4 - 10.6 | |
|
Mazda CX-9 petrol engines consumes on average 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Toyota Highlander. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Ground clearance: | 203 mm (8 inches) | 197 mm (7.8 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.10 m | 4.87 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 1.93 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.73 m | |
|
Mazda CX-9 is larger, but slightly lower. Mazda CX-9 is 23 cm longer than the Toyota Highlander, 1 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 487 litres | 391 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2852 litres | 2370 litres | |
|
Mazda CX-9 has more luggage capacity. Mazda CX-9 has 96 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Highlander. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-9 (by 482 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 5.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`712 | ~ 2`741 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 21 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-9 has
|
Toyota Highlander has
| |