Mazda CX-9 2012 vs Mazda CX-5 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mazda CX-9 is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Mazda CX-5 has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 3.7 (petrol) | 2.0 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 273 - 277 HP | 150 - 192 HP | |
| Torque: | 367 NM | 210 - 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 seconds | 7.9 - 10.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.3 | 4.6 - 7.3 | |
|
Mazda CX-9 petrol engines consumes on average 4.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda CX-5. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.10 m | 4.54 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.69 m | |
|
Mazda CX-9 is larger. Mazda CX-9 is 56 cm longer than the Mazda CX-5, 10 cm wider, while the height of Mazda CX-9 is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 487 litres | 505 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2852 litres | 1620 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Mazda CX-9 has 18 litres less trunk space than the Mazda CX-5. This could mean that the Mazda CX-9 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-9 (by 1232 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.2 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`712 | ~ 2`045 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 9600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-9 has
|
Mazda CX-5 has
| |