Mazda CX-9 2012 vs Mazda CX-5 2012

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Mazda CX-9
2012 - 2016
Mazda CX-5
2012 - 2015
Gearbox: Automatic Manual/Automatic
Mazda CX-9 is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Mazda CX-5 has both automatic and manual transmission options.
Engines: 3.7 (petrol)2.0 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel)
Both cars are available with petrol engines. Mazda CX-5 is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types.

Performance

Power: 273 HP150 - 192 HP
Torque: 367 NM210 - 420 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.1 seconds7.9 - 10.2 seconds
In general, Mazda CX-5 are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Mazda CX-9. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 11.34.6 - 7.3
Mazda CX-9 petrol engines consumes on average 4.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda CX-5.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 5.10 m4.54 m
Width: 1.94 m1.84 m
Height: 1.73 m1.69 m
Mazda CX-9 is larger.
Mazda CX-9 is 56 cm longer than the Mazda CX-5, 10 cm wider, while the height of Mazda CX-9 is 4 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 487 litres505 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
2852 litres1620 litres
Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Mazda CX-9 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-9 (by 1232 litres).
Turning diameter: no data11.2 meters
Gross weight: ~ 2`712 kg~ 2`045 kg
Net weight:~ 2`012 kg~ 1`473 kg
Load capacity:~ 700 kg~ 572 kg
Mazda CX-9 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 18 procentiem more than Mazda CX-5. Therefore, Mazda CX-9 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads.
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): no data7600
Pros and Cons: Mazda CX-9 has
  • automatic transmission only
  • only petrol engines available
  • more spacious trunk with the seats down
  • higher carrying (cargo) capacity
Mazda CX-5 has
  • both manual and automatic
  • petrol and diesel engines available
  • more powerful and dynamic engines
  • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv