Mazda CX-9 2012 vs Chevrolet Tahoe 2014
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Mazda CX-9 is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Chevrolet Tahoe can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Mazda CX-9 also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 3.7 | 5.3 - 6.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 273 - 277 HP | 355 - 426 HP | |
| Torque: | 367 NM | 519 - 624 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.3 | 11.9 - 12.1 | |
|
Mazda CX-9 petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than Chevrolet Tahoe. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Ground clearance: | 203 mm (8 inches) | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.10 m | 5.18 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 2.04 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.89 m | |
|
Mazda CX-9 is smaller. Mazda CX-9 is 9 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Tahoe, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda CX-9 is 16 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 487 litres | 433 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2852 litres | 2681 litres | |
|
Mazda CX-9 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Mazda CX-9 has 54 litres more trunk space than the Chevrolet Tahoe. The Chevrolet Tahoe may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-9 (by 171 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`712 | ~ 3`265 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 61 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-9 has
|
| |