Mazda CX-9 2009 vs Nissan Pathfinder 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mazda CX-9 is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Nissan Pathfinder has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Mazda CX-9 is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Nissan Pathfinder can be equipped only with four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Mazda CX-9 also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 3.7 | 2.5 - 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 273 HP | 190 - 231 HP | |
| Torque: | 367 NM | 450 - 550 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 8.9 - 11 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.2 - 12.9 | 8.7 - 9.5 | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.09 m | 4.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Mazda CX-9 is larger, but lower. Mazda CX-9 is 27 cm longer than the Nissan Pathfinder, 9 cm wider, while the height of Mazda CX-9 is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 487 litres | 515 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2852 litres | 2091 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Mazda CX-9 has 28 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Pathfinder. This could mean that the Mazda CX-9 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-9 (by 761 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-9 is 0.5 metres less than that of the Nissan Pathfinder, which means Mazda CX-9 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`013 | ~ 2`913 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 10 200 | 9200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-9 has
|
Nissan Pathfinder has
| |