Mazda CX-9 2009 vs Ford Explorer 2008
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Mazda CX-9 is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Ford Explorer can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Mazda CX-9 also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 3.7 | 4.0 - 4.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 273 HP | 213 - 296 HP | |
| Torque: | 367 NM | 344 - 460 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 8.9 - 10.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.2 - 12.9 | 13.5 - 14.3 | |
|
Mazda CX-9 petrol engines consumes on average 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Ford Explorer. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.09 m | 4.94 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.83 m | |
|
Mazda CX-9 is larger, but lower. Mazda CX-9 is 15 cm longer than the Ford Explorer, 6 cm wider, while the height of Mazda CX-9 is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 487 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2852 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-9 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Ford Explorer. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`013 | ~ 2`829 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 10 200 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-9 has
|
| |