Mazda CX-9 2009 vs BMW X5 2007
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Mazda CX-9 is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while BMW X5 can be equipped only with four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Mazda CX-9 also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 3.7 (petrol) | 3.0 - 4.8 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 273 HP | 235 - 355 HP | |
| Torque: | 367 NM | 315 - 580 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 6.5 - 8.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.2 - 12.9 | 8.1 - 12.0 | |
|
Mazda CX-9 petrol engines consumes on average 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than BMW X5. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Ground clearance: | 203 mm (8 inches) | 222 mm (8.7 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, BMW X5 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.09 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 1.93 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.77 m | |
|
Mazda CX-9 is larger, but lower. Mazda CX-9 is 24 cm longer than the BMW X5, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda CX-9 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 487 litres | 620 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2852 litres | 1750 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Mazda CX-9 has 133 litres less trunk space than the BMW X5. This could mean that the Mazda CX-9 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-9 (by 1102 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 13 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-9 is 1.6 metres less than that of the BMW X5, which means Mazda CX-9 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`013 | ~ 2`753 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 10 200 | 9800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-9 has
|
BMW X5 has
| |