Mazda CX-9 2007 vs Volvo XC90 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mazda CX-9 is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Volvo XC90 has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 3.5 (petrol) | 2.4 - 4.4 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 263 HP | 163 - 315 HP | |
| Torque: | 339 NM | 320 - 440 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 7.3 - 12 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.5 - 12.7 | 8.2 - 13.5 | |
|
Mazda CX-9 petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volvo XC90. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.07 m | 4.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 1.91 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.77 m | |
|
Mazda CX-9 is larger, but lower. Mazda CX-9 is 26 cm longer than the Volvo XC90, 3 cm wider, while the height of Mazda CX-9 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 487 litres | 249 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2852 litres | 1837 litres | |
|
Mazda CX-9 has more luggage capacity. Mazda CX-9 has 238 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC90. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-9 (by 1015 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12.5 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`685 | ~ 2`735 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 6600 | 8400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-9 has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |