Mazda CX-9 2007 vs Honda CR-V 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mazda CX-9 is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Honda CR-V has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Mazda CX-9 is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Honda CR-V can be equipped only with four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Mazda CX-9 also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 3.5 (petrol) | 2.0 - 2.4 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Honda CR-V is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 263 HP | 140 - 162 HP | |
| Torque: | 339 NM | 190 - 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.6 - 12 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.5 - 12.7 | 6.7 - 10.1 | |
|
Mazda CX-9 petrol engines consumes on average 2.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Honda CR-V. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.07 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Mazda CX-9 is larger. Mazda CX-9 is 46 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, 16 cm wider, while the height of Mazda CX-9 is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 487 litres | 527 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2852 litres | 952 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Mazda CX-9 has 40 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. This could mean that the Mazda CX-9 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-9 (by 1900 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`685 | ~ 1`910 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 6600 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-9 has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |