Mazda CX-9 2007 vs Toyota 4-Runner 2003

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Mazda CX-9
2007 - 2009
Toyota 4-Runner
2003 - 2005
Gearbox: Automatic Automatic
Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Mazda CX-9 is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Toyota 4-Runner can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Mazda CX-9 also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs.
Engines: 3.54.0 - 4.7

Performance

Power: 263 HP235 - 245 HP
Torque: 339 NM382 - 434 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a seconds7.8 - 8 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 11.5 - 12.712.2 - 14.1
Mazda CX-9 petrol engines consumes on average 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Toyota 4-Runner.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 5.07 m4.80 m
Width: 1.94 m1.88 m
Height: 1.73 m1.76 m
Mazda CX-9 is larger, but slightly lower.
Mazda CX-9 is 27 cm longer than the Toyota 4-Runner, 6 cm wider, while the height of Mazda CX-9 is 3 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 487 litres1195 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
2852 litres2050 litres
Despite its longer length, Mazda CX-9 has 708 litres less trunk space than the Toyota 4-Runner. This could mean that the Mazda CX-9 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-9 (by 802 litres).
Turning diameter: no data11.1 meters
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`685~ 2`411
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 6800no data
Pros and Cons: Mazda CX-9 has
  • also available in 2WD
  • lower fuel consumption
Toyota 4-Runner has
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv