Mazda CX-9 2007 vs Nissan X-Trail 2007
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mazda CX-9 is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Nissan X-Trail has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 3.5 (petrol) | 2.0 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 263 HP | 141 - 173 HP | |
| Torque: | 339 NM | 196 - 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.8 - 12.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.5 - 12.7 | 7.1 - 9.6 | |
|
Mazda CX-9 petrol engines consumes on average 3.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Nissan X-Trail. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.07 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Mazda CX-9 is larger. Mazda CX-9 is 44 cm longer than the Nissan X-Trail, 16 cm wider, while the height of Mazda CX-9 is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 487 litres | 479 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2852 litres | 1742 litres | |
| Mazda CX-9 has 8 litres more trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-9 (by 1110 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`685 | ~ 2`079 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 6600 | 4600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-9 has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |