Mazda CX-9 2007 vs Nissan Navara 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Mazda CX-9 is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Nissan Navara has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Mazda CX-9 is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Nissan Navara can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Mazda CX-9 also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
Engines: | 3.5 (petrol) | 2.5 - 4.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 263 HP | 174 - 265 HP | |
Torque: | 339 NM | 385 - 403 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11.4 - 11.5 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.5 - 12.7 | 8.5 - 13.8 | |
Mazda CX-9 petrol engines consumes on average 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than Nissan Navara. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.07 m | 5.22 m | |
Width: | 1.94 m | 1.85 m | |
Height: | 1.73 m | 1.78 m | |
Mazda CX-9 is 15 cm shorter than the Nissan Navara, 9 cm wider, while the height of Mazda CX-9 is 5 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 487 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2852 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | no data | 13.3 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`685 | ~ 3`000 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 6600 | 6000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-9 has
|
Nissan Navara has
| |