Mazda CX-9 2007 vs Mercedes ML 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Mazda CX-9 is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Mercedes ML can be equipped only with four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Mazda CX-9 also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 3.5 (petrol) | 3.0 - 6.2 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Mercedes ML is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 263 HP | 190 - 510 HP | |
| Torque: | 339 NM | 350 - 700 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 5 - 9.8 seconds | |
| In general, Mercedes ML are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Mazda CX-9. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.5 - 12.7 | 9.4 - 16.0 | |
|
Mazda CX-9 petrol engines consumes on average 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mercedes ML. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.07 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 1.91 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.82 m | |
|
Mazda CX-9 is larger, but lower. Mazda CX-9 is 29 cm longer than the Mercedes ML, 3 cm wider, while the height of Mazda CX-9 is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 487 litres | 551 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2852 litres | 2050 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Mazda CX-9 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-9 (by 802 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12 meters | |
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`685 kg | ~ 2`854 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 2`064 kg | ~ 2`156 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 621 kg | ~ 698 kg | |
| Mazda CX-9 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 12 procentiem less than Mercedes ML. Therefore, Mercedes ML is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 6000 | 4800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-9 has
|
Mercedes ML has
| |