Mazda CX-9 2007 vs Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Mazda CX-9 is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Land Rover Range Rover Sport can be equipped only with four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Mazda CX-9 also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 3.5 (petrol) | 2.7 - 4.4 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 263 HP | 190 - 390 HP | |
| Torque: | 339 NM | 425 - 640 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 7.6 - 12.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.5 - 12.7 | 10.2 - 15.9 | |
|
Mazda CX-9 petrol engines consumes on average 3.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Land Rover Range Rover Sport. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.07 m | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 1.93 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Mazda CX-9 is larger, but lower. Mazda CX-9 is 28 cm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda CX-9 is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 487 litres | 960 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2852 litres | no data | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mazda CX-9 has 473 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport. This could mean that the Mazda CX-9 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`685 | ~ 3`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6600 | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-9 has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
| |