Mazda CX-9 2007 vs Ford Explorer 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Mazda CX-9 is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Ford Explorer can be equipped only with rear wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 3.5 | 4.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 263 HP | 295 HP | |
| Torque: | 339 NM | 406 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.5 - 12.7 | 14.3 | |
|
Mazda CX-9 petrol engines consumes on average 2.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Ford Explorer. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.07 m | 4.91 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.85 m | |
|
Mazda CX-9 is larger, but lower. Mazda CX-9 is 16 cm longer than the Ford Explorer, 6 cm wider, while the height of Mazda CX-9 is 12 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 487 litres | 385 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2852 litres | no data | |
|
Mazda CX-9 has more luggage capacity. Mazda CX-9 has 102 litres more trunk space than the Ford Explorer. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`685 | ~ 2`825 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6600 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-9 has
|
| |