Mazda CX-5 2012 vs Volkswagen Tiguan 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 175 HP | 184 HP | |
| Torque: | 420 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 seconds | 8.3 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Tiguan is a more dynamic driving. Mazda CX-5 engine produces 9 HP less power than Volkswagen Tiguan, but torque is 40 NM more than Volkswagen Tiguan. Due to the lower power, Mazda CX-5 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 5.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.0 l/100km | 7.7 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Tiguan is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Mazda CX-5 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Tiguan, which means that by driving the Mazda CX-5 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Mazda CX-5 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Tiguan. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1050 km in combined cycle | 1120 km in combined cycle | |
| 1180 km on highway | 1280 km on highway | ||
| 720 km with real consumption | 830 km with real consumption | ||
| Volkswagen Tiguan gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.54 m | 4.43 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.70 m | |
|
Mazda CX-5 is larger. Mazda CX-5 is 11 cm longer than the Volkswagen Tiguan, 3 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 505 litres | 470 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1620 litres | 1510 litres | |
|
Mazda CX-5 has more luggage capacity. Mazda CX-5 has 35 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Tiguan. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-5 (by 110 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-5 is 0.8 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Tiguan, which means Mazda CX-5 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`120 | 2`280 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | low | |
| Mazda CX-5 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Tiguan has serious deffects in 85 percent more cases than Mazda CX-5, so Mazda CX-5 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8800 | 10 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-5 has
|
Volkswagen Tiguan has
| |