Mazda CX-5 2012 vs Mazda CX-5 2012 vs Mazda CX-5 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 175 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 9.4 seconds | |
|
Mazda CX-5 2015 is a more dynamic driving. Mazda CX-5 2012 engine produces 25 HP less power than Mazda CX-5 2015, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Mazda CX-5 2015. Due to the lower power, Mazda CX-5 2012 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 5.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.5 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda CX-5 2012 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda CX-5 2012 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-5 2015, which means that by driving the Mazda CX-5 2012 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda CX-5 2012 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-5 2015. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 56 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1050 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
| 1190 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
| 740 km with real consumption | 760 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Mazda CX-5 2015: Engine power is automatically (without driver intervention) distributed among the wheels based on conditions using a hydraulic multi-disc clutch, viscous clutch, or similar traction control device. Some systems allow locking of multi-disc clutch manually for permanent all wheel drive. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 380'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 6, Mazda 3, Mazda CX-7 | Used also on Mazda 6 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Mazda CX-5 2015 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.54 m | 4.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.67 m | |
| Mazda CX-5 2012 is 2 cm shorter than the Mazda CX-5 2015, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda CX-5 2012 is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 505 litres | 503 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1620 litres | 1620 litres | |
| Mazda CX-5 2012 has 2 litres more trunk space than the Mazda CX-5 2015. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-5 2012 is 0.5 metres less than that of the Mazda CX-5 2015, which means Mazda CX-5 2012 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`050 | 2`140 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 9800 | 15 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-5 has
|
Mazda CX-5 has
| |