Mazda CX-5 2012 vs Mazda CX-5 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 10 seconds | |
| Mazda CX-5 2012 and Mazda CX-5 2015 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Mazda CX-5 2012 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 4.7 | |
|
The Mazda CX-5 2015 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda CX-5 2012 consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-5 2015, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda CX-5 2012 could require 90 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 56 litres | 56 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1050 km in combined cycle | 1190 km in combined cycle | |
| 1190 km on highway | 1360 km on highway | ||
| Mazda CX-5 2015 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.54 m | 4.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.71 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda CX-5 2012 is 2 cm shorter than the Mazda CX-5 2015, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 505 litres | 503 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1620 litres | 1620 litres | |
| Mazda CX-5 2012 has 2 litres more trunk space than the Mazda CX-5 2015. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-5 2012 is 0.5 metres less than that of the Mazda CX-5 2015, which means Mazda CX-5 2012 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`050 | 2`050 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 8800 | 13 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-5 has
|
Mazda CX-5 has
| |