Mazda CX-5 2012 vs BMW X1 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 8.3 seconds | |
|
BMW X1 is a more dynamic driving. Mazda CX-5 engine produces 13 HP less power than BMW X1, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Mazda CX-5 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 4.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.5 l/100km | 6.0 l/100km | |
|
The BMW X1 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda CX-5 consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X1, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda CX-5 could require 120 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda CX-5 consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X1. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 56 litres | 61 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1050 km in combined cycle | 1350 km in combined cycle | |
| 1190 km on highway | 1480 km on highway | ||
| 740 km with real consumption | 1010 km with real consumption | ||
| BMW X1 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.54 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.55 m | |
|
Mazda CX-5 is larger. Mazda CX-5 is 6 cm longer than the BMW X1, 4 cm wider, while the height of Mazda CX-5 is 17 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 505 litres | 420 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1620 litres | 1350 litres | |
|
Mazda CX-5 has more luggage capacity. Mazda CX-5 has 85 litres more trunk space than the BMW X1. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-5 (by 270 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-5 is 0.6 metres less than that of the BMW X1, which means Mazda CX-5 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`050 | 2`045 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Mazda CX-5 scores higher in safety tests. The Mazda CX-5 scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| BMW X1 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda CX-5 has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than BMW X1, so BMW X1 quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8800 | 10 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-5 has
|
BMW X1 has
| |