Mazda CX-5 2012 vs Honda CR-V 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Mazda CX-5 is more dynamic to drive. Mazda CX-5 engine produces 30 HP more power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 80 NM more than Honda CR-V. Thanks to more power Mazda CX-5 reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 | 4.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.9 l/100km | 5.7 l/100km | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Mazda CX-5 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda CX-5 could require 15 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda CX-5 consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 56 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1210 km in combined cycle | 1280 km in combined cycle | |
| 1360 km on highway | 1340 km on highway | ||
| 810 km with real consumption | 1010 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.54 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.69 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda CX-5 is 3 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mazda CX-5 is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 505 litres | 589 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1620 litres | 1669 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage space. Mazda CX-5 has 84 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda CR-V (by 49 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-5 is 0.6 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Mazda CX-5 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`035 | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Mazda CX-5 scores higher in safety tests, but Honda CR-V is better rated in child safety tests. The Mazda CX-5 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | high | above average | |
| Mazda CX-5 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Honda CR-V has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Mazda CX-5, so Mazda CX-5 quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8800 | 11 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-5 has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |