Mazda CX-5 2012 vs Renault Koleos 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 173 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | 11.9 seconds | |
|
Mazda CX-5 is more dynamic to drive. Mazda CX-5 engine produces 23 HP less power than Renault Koleos, but torque is 20 NM more than Renault Koleos. Despite less power, Mazda CX-5 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 | 7.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.9 l/100km | 8.2 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda CX-5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda CX-5 consumes 2.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Koleos, which means that by driving the Mazda CX-5 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 375 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda CX-5 consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Koleos. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 56 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1210 km in combined cycle | 910 km in combined cycle | |
| 1360 km on highway | 1040 km on highway | ||
| 810 km with real consumption | 790 km with real consumption | ||
| Mazda CX-5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 6, Mazda 3, Mazda CX-7 | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Opel Vivaro | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Koleos might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Renault Koleos engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Renault Koleos 2013 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.54 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.70 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda CX-5 is 2 cm longer than the Renault Koleos, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda CX-5 is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 505 litres | 450 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1620 litres | 1380 litres | |
|
Mazda CX-5 has more luggage capacity. Mazda CX-5 has 55 litres more trunk space than the Renault Koleos. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-5 (by 240 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-5 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Renault Koleos, which means Mazda CX-5 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`035 | 2`300 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Mazda CX-5 scores higher in safety tests, but Renault Koleos is better rated in child safety tests. The Mazda CX-5 scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 8800 | 8200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-5 has
|
Renault Koleos has
| |