Mazda CX-5 2012 vs Opel Antara 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Mazda CX-5 is more dynamic to drive. Mazda CX-5 engine produces 13 HP less power than Opel Antara, but torque is 30 NM more than Opel Antara. Despite less power, Mazda CX-5 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 | 6.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.9 l/100km | 7.9 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda CX-5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda CX-5 consumes 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Antara, which means that by driving the Mazda CX-5 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 270 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda CX-5 consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Antara. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 56 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1210 km in combined cycle | 1010 km in combined cycle | |
| 1360 km on highway | 1160 km on highway | ||
| 810 km with real consumption | 820 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.54 m | 4.60 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.76 m | |
|
Mazda CX-5 is smaller. Mazda CX-5 is 6 cm shorter than the Opel Antara, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda CX-5 is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 505 litres | 402 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1620 litres | 1391 litres | |
|
Mazda CX-5 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Mazda CX-5 has 103 litres more trunk space than the Opel Antara. The Opel Antara may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-5 (by 229 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 12.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-5 is 1.1 metres less than that of the Opel Antara, which means Mazda CX-5 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`035 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 10 000 | 7800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-5 has
|
Opel Antara has
| |