Mazda CX-5 2012 vs Ford Kuga 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Mazda CX-5 is more dynamic to drive. Mazda CX-5 engine produces 10 HP more power than Ford Kuga, whereas torque is 150 NM more than Ford Kuga. Thanks to more power Mazda CX-5 reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 | 6.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.9 l/100km | 7.7 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda CX-5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda CX-5 consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Kuga, which means that by driving the Mazda CX-5 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 240 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda CX-5 consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Kuga. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 56 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1210 km in combined cycle | 960 km in combined cycle | |
| 1360 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
| 810 km with real consumption | 770 km with real consumption | ||
| Mazda CX-5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.54 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.68 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda CX-5 is 2 cm longer than the Ford Kuga, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda CX-5 is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 505 litres | 456 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1620 litres | 1568 litres | |
|
Mazda CX-5 has more luggage capacity. Mazda CX-5 has 49 litres more trunk space than the Ford Kuga. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-5 (by 52 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-5 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Ford Kuga. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`035 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Mazda CX-5 has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Ford Kuga, so Mazda CX-5 quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 9600 | 12 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-5 has
|
| |