Mazda CX-5 2013 vs Toyota RAV4 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 192 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 256 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.9 seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
|
Mazda CX-5 is more dynamic to drive. Mazda CX-5 engine produces 42 HP more power than Toyota RAV4, but torque is 84 NM less than Toyota RAV4. Thanks to more power Mazda CX-5 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 | 7.2 | |
| Mazda CX-5 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda CX-5 could require 15 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 56 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 910 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| Toyota RAV4 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Toyota RAV4 2010: It has proactive automatic all-wheel drive and acts as front-wheel drive under normal conditions. In the event of wheel slip, torque is transferred to the rear wheels via an electronically controlled multi-plate clutch. The clutch can also be locked manually using a button on the console. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 6, Mazda 3 | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla Verso, Toyota Verso | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota RAV4 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.54 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.69 m | |
| Mazda CX-5 is 18 cm longer than the Toyota RAV4, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda CX-5 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 403 litres | 586 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1620 litres | 1752 litres | |
|
Toyota RAV4 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mazda CX-5 has 183 litres less trunk space than the Toyota RAV4. This could mean that the Mazda CX-5 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota RAV4 (by 132 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-5 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Toyota RAV4, which means Mazda CX-5 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`075 | 2`190 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Mazda CX-5 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Toyota RAV4 has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Mazda CX-5, so Mazda CX-5 quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 9600 | 9800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-5 has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |