Mazda CX-5 2013 vs Mazda CX-7 2009
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 192 HP | 173 HP | |
| Torque: | 256 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.9 seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
|
Mazda CX-5 is more dynamic to drive. Mazda CX-5 engine produces 19 HP more power than Mazda CX-7, but torque is 144 NM less than Mazda CX-7. Thanks to more power Mazda CX-5 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 | 7.5 | |
| Mazda CX-5 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-7, which means that by driving the Mazda CX-5 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 56 litres | 69 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 910 km in combined cycle | |
| 910 km on highway | 1040 km on highway | ||
| Mazda CX-7 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 380'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda CX-5 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 6, Mazda 3 | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 6, Mazda 3 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mazda CX-5 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Mazda CX-5 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.54 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.65 m | |
|
Mazda CX-5 is smaller, but slightly higher. Mazda CX-5 is 16 cm shorter than the Mazda CX-7, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda CX-5 is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 403 litres | 455 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1620 litres | 774 litres | |
| Mazda CX-5 has 52 litres less trunk space than the Mazda CX-7. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-5 (by 846 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-5 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Mazda CX-7. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`075 | 2`430 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Mazda CX-5 scores higher in safety tests, but Mazda CX-7 is better rated in child safety tests. The Mazda CX-5 scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 8800 | 6200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-5 has
|
Mazda CX-7 has
| |