Mazda CX-5 2013 vs Mazda CX-5 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 192 HP | 175 HP | |
| Torque: | 256 NM | 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.9 seconds | 9.4 seconds | |
|
Mazda CX-5 2013 is more dynamic to drive. Mazda CX-5 2013 engine produces 17 HP more power than Mazda CX-5 2015, but torque is 164 NM less than Mazda CX-5 2015. Thanks to more power Mazda CX-5 2013 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 | 5.9 | |
|
The Mazda CX-5 2015 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda CX-5 2013 consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-5 2015, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda CX-5 2013 could require 210 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 56 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
| 910 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
| Mazda CX-5 2015 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Mazda CX-5 2015: Engine power is automatically (without driver intervention) distributed among the wheels based on conditions using a hydraulic multi-disc clutch, viscous clutch, or similar traction control device. Some systems allow locking of multi-disc clutch manually for permanent all wheel drive. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda CX-5 2013 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 6, Mazda 3 | Used also on Mazda 6 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mazda CX-5 2013 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.54 m | 4.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.67 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda CX-5 2013 is 2 cm shorter than the Mazda CX-5 2015, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 403 litres | 503 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1620 litres | 1620 litres | |
|
Mazda CX-5 2015 has more luggage space. Mazda CX-5 2013 has 100 litres less trunk space than the Mazda CX-5 2015. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-5 2013 is 0.5 metres less than that of the Mazda CX-5 2015, which means Mazda CX-5 2013 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`075 | 2`140 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 9600 | 15 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-5 has
|
Mazda CX-5 has
| |