Mazda CX-5 2013 vs Mazda CX-5 2015

 
Mazda CX-5
2013 - 2015
Mazda CX-5
2015 - 2017
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.5 Diesel2.2 Diesel

Performance

Power: 192 HP150 HP
Torque: 256 NM380 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.9 seconds10 seconds
Mazda CX-5 2013 is more dynamic to drive.
Mazda CX-5 2013 engine produces 42 HP more power than Mazda CX-5 2015, but torque is 124 NM less than Mazda CX-5 2015. Thanks to more power Mazda CX-5 2013 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.34.7
The Mazda CX-5 2015 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Mazda CX-5 2013 consumes 2.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-5 2015, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda CX-5 2013 could require 390 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 56 litres56 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 760 km in combined cycle1190 km in combined cycle
910 km on highway1360 km on highway
Mazda CX-5 2015 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.54 m4.56 m
Width: 1.84 m1.84 m
Height: 1.67 m1.71 m
Mazda CX-5 2013 is 2 cm shorter than the Mazda CX-5 2015, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda CX-5 2013 is 4 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 403 litres503 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1620 litres1620 litres
Mazda CX-5 2015 has more luggage space.
Mazda CX-5 2013 has 100 litres less trunk space than the Mazda CX-5 2015.
Turning diameter: 11.2 meters11.7 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda CX-5 2013 is 0.5 metres less than that of the Mazda CX-5 2015, which means Mazda CX-5 2013 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`0752`050
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average

above average
Average price (€): 880013 000
Pros and Cons: Mazda CX-5 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower price
Mazda CX-5 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv