Mazda CX-5 2013 vs Mazda CX-5 2015
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 192 HP | 150 HP | |
Torque: | 256 NM | 380 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.9 seconds | 10 seconds | |
Mazda CX-5 2013 is more dynamic to drive. Mazda CX-5 2013 engine produces 42 HP more power than Mazda CX-5 2015, but torque is 124 NM less than Mazda CX-5 2015. Thanks to more power Mazda CX-5 2013 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 | 4.7 | |
The Mazda CX-5 2015 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda CX-5 2013 consumes 2.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-5 2015, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda CX-5 2013 could require 390 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 56 litres | 56 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 1190 km in combined cycle | |
910 km on highway | 1360 km on highway | ||
Mazda CX-5 2015 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.54 m | 4.56 m | |
Width: | 1.84 m | 1.84 m | |
Height: | 1.67 m | 1.71 m | |
Mazda CX-5 2013 is 2 cm shorter than the Mazda CX-5 2015, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda CX-5 2013 is 4 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 403 litres | 503 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1620 litres | 1620 litres | |
Mazda CX-5 2015 has more luggage space. Mazda CX-5 2013 has 100 litres less trunk space than the Mazda CX-5 2015. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.7 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mazda CX-5 2013 is 0.5 metres less than that of the Mazda CX-5 2015, which means Mazda CX-5 2013 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`075 | 2`050 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | above average | above average | |
Average price (€): | 8800 | 13 000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-5 has
|
Mazda CX-5 has
| |