Mazda CX-5 2012 vs Toyota RAV4 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 158 HP | |
| Torque: | 210 NM | 198 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.8 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Mazda CX-5 is more dynamic to drive. Mazda CX-5 engine produces 8 HP less power than Toyota RAV4, but torque is 12 NM more than Toyota RAV4. Despite less power, Mazda CX-5 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 7.5 | |
|
The Mazda CX-5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda CX-5 consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4, which means that by driving the Mazda CX-5 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 860 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 980 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| Mazda CX-5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda CX-5 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 17 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mazda 6, Mazda 3, Mazda MX-5, Mazda CX-3 | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Lexus NX, Toyota C-HR | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Mazda CX-5 2012 2.0 engine: This engine is not well-suited for low-quality fuel, as it quickly clogs the fuel system. The use of substandard fuel often leads to the failure of expensive ignition coils, resulting in significant repair ... More about Mazda CX-5 2012 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.54 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.72 m | |
|
Mazda CX-5 is larger, but lower. Mazda CX-5 is 18 cm longer than the Toyota RAV4, 3 cm wider, while the height of Mazda CX-5 is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 463 litres | 586 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1620 litres | 1752 litres | |
|
Toyota RAV4 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mazda CX-5 has 123 litres less trunk space than the Toyota RAV4. This could mean that the Mazda CX-5 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota RAV4 (by 132 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-5 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Toyota RAV4. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`045 | 2`110 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Mazda CX-5 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Toyota RAV4 has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Mazda CX-5, so Mazda CX-5 quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8800 | 9400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-5 has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |