Mazda CX-5 2012 vs Nissan X-Trail 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 169 HP | |
| Torque: | 210 NM | 233 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.8 seconds | 10.3 seconds | |
| Mazda CX-5 engine produces 19 HP less power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 23 NM less than Nissan X-Trail. Despite less power, Mazda CX-5 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | no data | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
|
Mazda CX-5 has 4x4: Engine power is automatically (without driver intervention) distributed among the wheels based on conditions using a hydraulic multi-disc clutch, viscous clutch, or similar traction control device. Some systems allow locking of multi-disc clutch manually for permanent all wheel drive. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 25 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mazda 6, Mazda 3, Mazda MX-5, Mazda CX-3 | Used also on Nissan Sentra | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Mazda CX-5 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Mazda CX-5 2012 2.0 engine: This engine is not well-suited for low-quality fuel, as it quickly clogs the fuel system. The use of substandard fuel often leads to the failure of expensive ignition coils, resulting in significant repair ... More about Mazda CX-5 2012 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.54 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.70 m | |
| Mazda CX-5 is 10 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 5 cm wider, while the height of Mazda CX-5 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 463 litres | 603 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1620 litres | no data | |
|
Nissan X-Trail has more luggage space. Mazda CX-5 has 140 litres less trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`045 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 8800 | 8600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-5 has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |