Mazda CX-5 2012 vs Nissan X-Trail 2014
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 144 HP | |
| Torque: | 210 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
|
Mazda CX-5 is more dynamic to drive. Mazda CX-5 engine produces 6 HP more power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 10 NM more than Nissan X-Trail. Thanks to more power Mazda CX-5 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 8.3 | |
|
The Mazda CX-5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda CX-5 consumes 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that by driving the Mazda CX-5 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 315 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 56 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 1050 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
| Mazda CX-5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 300'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda CX-5 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mazda 6, Mazda 3, Mazda MX-5, Mazda CX-3 | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Nissan Serena | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mazda CX-5 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Mazda CX-5 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Mazda CX-5 2012 2.0 engine: This engine is not well-suited for low-quality fuel, as it quickly clogs the fuel system. The use of substandard fuel often leads to the failure of expensive ignition coils, resulting in significant repair ... More about Mazda CX-5 2012 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.54 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.72 m | |
| Mazda CX-5 is 10 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mazda CX-5 is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 463 litres | 497 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1620 litres | no data | |
|
Nissan X-Trail has more luggage space. Mazda CX-5 has 34 litres less trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`945 | 1`930 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | Nissan X-Trail has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Mazda CX-5, so Nissan X-Trail quality could be a bit better. | ||
| Average price (€): | 8800 | 11 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-5 has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |