Mazda CX-5 2015 vs Toyota RAV4 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 192 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 256 NM | 233 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.9 seconds | 9.4 seconds | |
|
Mazda CX-5 is more dynamic to drive. Mazda CX-5 engine produces 12 HP more power than Toyota RAV4, whereas torque is 23 NM more than Toyota RAV4. Thanks to more power Mazda CX-5 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 | 8.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.7 l/100km | 9.6 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda CX-5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda CX-5 consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4, which means that by driving the Mazda CX-5 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 195 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda CX-5 consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 790 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 950 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| 660 km with real consumption | 620 km with real consumption | ||
| Mazda CX-5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Ground clearance: | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | 155 mm (6.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda CX-5 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 16 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 6, Mazda 3 | Used also on Toyota Camry | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.56 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.72 m | |
|
Mazda CX-5 is smaller. Mazda CX-5 is 5 cm shorter than the Toyota RAV4, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda CX-5 is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 503 litres | 577 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1620 litres | 2078 litres | |
|
Toyota RAV4 has more luggage space. Mazda CX-5 has 74 litres less trunk space than the Toyota RAV4. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota RAV4 (by 458 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`075 | 2`130 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Toyota RAV4 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda CX-5 has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Toyota RAV4, so Toyota RAV4 quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 15 000 | 16 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-5 has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |