Mazda CX-5 2015 vs Mazda CX-5 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 192 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 256 NM | 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.9 seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
|
Mazda CX-5 2015 is more dynamic to drive. Mazda CX-5 2015 engine produces 42 HP more power than Mazda CX-5 2012, whereas torque is 46 NM more than Mazda CX-5 2012. Thanks to more power Mazda CX-5 2015 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 | 6.7 | |
|
The Mazda CX-5 2012 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda CX-5 2015 consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-5 2012, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda CX-5 2015 could require 90 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 790 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
| 950 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| Mazda CX-5 2012 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 6, Mazda 3 | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mazda 6, Mazda 3, Mazda MX-5, Mazda CX-3 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mazda CX-5 2012 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Mazda CX-5 2012 2.0 engine: This engine is not well-suited for low-quality fuel, as it quickly clogs the fuel system. The use of substandard fuel often leads to the failure of expensive ignition coils, resulting in significant repair ... More about Mazda CX-5 2012 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.56 m | 4.54 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.67 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda CX-5 2015 is 2 cm longer than the Mazda CX-5 2012, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 503 litres | 463 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1620 litres | 1620 litres | |
|
Mazda CX-5 2015 has more luggage capacity. Mazda CX-5 2015 has 40 litres more trunk space than the Mazda CX-5 2012. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-5 2015 is 0.5 metres more than that of the Mazda CX-5 2012, which means Mazda CX-5 2015 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`075 | 2`045 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 13 000 | 8800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-5 has
|
Mazda CX-5 has
| |