Mazda CX-5 2015 vs Volkswagen Tiguan 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 175 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 420 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
| Mazda CX-5 engine produces 25 HP more power than Volkswagen Tiguan, whereas torque is 80 NM more than Volkswagen Tiguan. Thanks to more power Mazda CX-5 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 5.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.6 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Tiguan is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda CX-5 consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Tiguan, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda CX-5 could require 90 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda CX-5 consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Tiguan. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 980 km in combined cycle | 1130 km in combined cycle | |
| 1090 km on highway | 1220 km on highway | ||
| 760 km with real consumption | 860 km with real consumption | ||
| Volkswagen Tiguan gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda CX-5 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.56 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.67 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda CX-5 is 7 cm longer than the Volkswagen Tiguan, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 503 litres | 615 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1620 litres | 1655 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Tiguan has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Mazda CX-5 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Tiguan (by 35 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-5 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Tiguan. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`140 kg | 2`320 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`495 kg | 1`640 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 645 kg | 680 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | Volkswagen Tiguan has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda CX-5 has serious deffects in 70 percent more cases than Volkswagen Tiguan, so Volkswagen Tiguan quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 11 000 | 15 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-5 has
|
Volkswagen Tiguan has
| |